"Oncologists do not usually need bodyguards when they present scientific data at a medical symposium," writes Rob Stein of the Washington Post, "[b]ut when Howard I Scher of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Maha Hussain of the University of Michigan spoke at a recent meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, they were in fear of their safety."
According to Stein, the two physicians encouraged the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") to delay approval of Provenge, a drug designed to treat advanced prostate cancer, causing some investors, patients and patient advocates to voice their dismay. Some, he reports, have placed "vitriolic postings" on the internet, while, according to the two doctors, others have threatened them. Of the threats, Hussain stated, "We have been harassed and trashed for giving our opinion in an area of our expertise. . . . It's been a nightmare, to say the least."
Frank Burroughs, a spokesperson for Abigail Alliance, the group that sued the FDA in attempt to obtain increased access to experimental medications for the terminally ill, voiced support for allowing access to the drug for terminally ill patients. He stated, "What we're saying is that when you have a drug like Provenge, you should let people have access to it who have run out of options."